RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Lightning Protection

To: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Lightning Protection
From: dalej <dj2001x@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:44:26 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I put large loops in my coax at the top of the tower.  The idea being the 
lightning striking the antenna goes down the coax and won't make the bend so it 
just shoots out the coax and not down to the rig.  I suppose it's not very 
effective, but I had some extra up there so I figured why not.

Interesting discussion about lightning. 

73
Dale, k9vuj



On 02, Jul 2012, at 8:08, Kim Elmore wrote:

> No, not effective. Again, because *everything else* is in corona (tower legs, 
> rivets, weld sputters, bolt threads, nut shoulders, joints of all kinds) and 
> because lightning propagation isn't driven by small variations in the local 
> electric field, which is all these devices can accomplish. Lightning begins 
> well aloft in the cloud, when the e-field approaches 1 M V/m and propagates 
> at the very high e-field at the tip of the stepped leader. The downward 
> propagating stepped leader is typically met 100-200 m above the surface by an 
> upward-propagating streamer, which is caused by the local e-field induced by 
> the stepped leader. All of this happens faster (think relativistic speeds) 
> than corona currents can diffuse away from the source.
> 
> Kim N5OP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 1, 2012, at 23:21, "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk@earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
>> "I asked them about these corona brushes and was told that they are 
>> ineffective. Once the electric field exceeds about 50-100 kV per meter, 
>> everything -- grass, trees, fences, antennas -- are all in corona and the 
>> air is about as "saturated" with corona ionization as it can get. These 
>> corona brushes have no effect"
>> 
>> Several of htese at a site won't lower the potential in the immediate area 
>> preventing charges in the 50-100 kV per meter range?
>> 
>> I see the diasharge brushes on remote sites, radar, repeaters, surveillance, 
>> even airports surrounded by towers with brush arrays a few tens of feet 
>> across?
>> 
>> Not effective at all?  What about a row of air teminals on a house?
>> 
>> Kurt
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>