Pete, you are truly a gentleman through and through. Thanks for the
clarification.
Ed
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Smith [mailto:n4zr@contesting.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 12:56 PM
> To: Hare,Ed, W1RFI; rfi@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [RFI] NPR BPL Story
>
>
> At 12:20 PM 5/27/2004, Hare,Ed, W1RFI wrote:
> >ARRL's work has been reasoned, reasonable and based on sound
> findings, not
> >speculation. I would not personally stand for any
> "doctoring" of results,
> >mine or any that I am aware of. It is fine to put one's best
> foot forward,
> >but the concerns that ARRL has raised are real and have been fully
> >supported by the work of independent consultants, NTIA and
> others. Those
> >that know me well know that I would never knowingly say
> anything that I
> >did not personally believe to be true.
>
>
> On re-reading my comment, I can see how Ed (and perhaps others) could
> misread it. What I meant was that ARINC, NTIA and the ARRL cannot be
> construed as working to protect their "commercial interest."
> The reference
> to (a real strentch) referred to the notion that ARRL somehow has a
> "commercial interest" in the continued health of amateur
> radio. I did
> *not* mean, in reference to any of them, and particularly the
> ARRL, to
> suggest that their technical contributions had been doctored.
> I think we
> all understand that the BPL providers have the monopoly on
> self-serving
> pseudo-science in this debate.
>
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> The World HF Contest Station Database
> was updated on April 26, 2004
> 2706 contest stations at
> www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm
>
>
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|