To: | "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] TVI |
From: | edoc <kd4e@arrl.net> |
Reply-to: | kd4e@arrl.net |
Date: | Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:06:44 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
What is needed there, and elsewhere, is for the friendly helpful legal
staff at the ARRL to generate a release form and a letter of explanation
for the neighbor to read and sign that releases the Ham from all
liability. (And an alternative explanation as to where they might find "professional services" together with typical costs, if they don't want the "amateur" neighbor repairing their defective-manufacture equipment for free. The reason that they would sign it is because they otherwise have to tolerate the interference from the Ham's gear, and because their interference-generating gear is technically subject to seizure as generating signals that illegally interfere with Primary Users, Ham and Broadcast. IMHO, YMMV ... 73, doc kd4e Ed -K0iL wrote: So if you live in CA and have a ham next door and rcv interference; you call the FCC and they tell you they don't handle interference complaints any longer; and the ham's hands are tied by law and can do nothing to help? Sounds like a powder keg waiting to blow to me. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [RFI] TVI, Chuck Gooden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RFI] Source found Was: Can you identify this interference?, Alex |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [RFI] TVI, Chuck Gooden |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] TVI, N6KJ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |