To: | orion@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Orion] Inrad #352 Filter for Orion |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Date: | Sun, 06 Jun 2004 21:41:04 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:orion@contesting.com> |
Rob Sherwood NC0B of Sherwood Engineering recently made some IMD measurements of the Inrad #352 650 Hz roofing filter (inserted in Orion's 1000 Hz position) that several of us made as a special order in January. Here is a summary of Rob's results: > At 5, 10 and 20 kHz, there is no significant difference between the > stock 1.0 kHz Ten-Tec filter and the Inrad filter. > At 2 kHz spacing, the improvement is on the order of 6 to 7 dB. > At 1 kHz spacing the improvement is closer to 10 dB. > There is some strange hysteresis of a couple dB, as you change the level > around. The IMD does not act exactly as one would expect. > I am guessing the digital AGC is doing strange things, causing the > hysteresis. > > The insertion loss of filters #2 and #3 are identical to the Ten-Tec 1.0 > kHz filter.
http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dynamic_Range_Data.pdf More info on building these filters is at the site below: http://users.vnet.net/btippett/inrad_.htm Barry N1EU also has a site on building the filter using NPO disc capacitors instead of the supplied surface mount caps, but qsl.net is down at the moment and I cannot bring up the URL. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Next by Date: | [Orion] Rig Freeze, Rein Couperus |
---|---|
Next by Thread: | RE: [Orion] Inrad #352 Filter for Orion, BarryG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |