HAH! So that's why. I see a 3.2 on one of the systems we tried to upgrade.
You'd think KN would check these things...? What do we do to upgrade it?
Regards,
Jayson A. Baker
Peak Internet Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:53 AM
To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What
areweallgoingtodoforCPE's?
This information is based on my "own" personal testing w/ the code on
different hardware.
The configurator does release this firmware version under the system
information TAB
Look at the end of the "Description" field
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On
> Behalf Of Jayson A. Baker
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 10:36 AM
> To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are
> weallgoingtodoforCPE's?
>
> I've never been asked that.
>
> Regards,
> Jayson A. Baker
> Peak Internet Solutions
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:09 AM
> To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are we
> allgoingtodoforCPE's?
>
> I am talking about the "firmware" on the ap-1000
>
> Not the karlnet code, there is a system firmware which can be
confirmed
> using the configurator (before you upgrade)
>
> I've updated several v3.70firmware/bootware ap 1000's to v4.45 karlnet
> code with out issue
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On
> > Behalf Of Jayson A. Baker
> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:37 AM
> > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are we all
> > goingtodoforCPE's?
> >
> > 4.44-02
> >
> > Why on Earth would you be running 3.2 still?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jayson A. Baker
> > Peak Internet Solutions
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> > On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:33 AM
> > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are we all
going
> > todoforCPE's?
> >
> > Jayson - did you find out what "firmware" was on your ap-1000's? I
> have
> > found that firmware v3.70 and above support v4.45 with out issue
> >
> > For firmware v3.20 - forget it - I upgraded it and could no longer
> > access the unit ( could ping it though )
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On
> > > Behalf Of Jayson A. Baker
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:30 AM
> > > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are we all
> going
> > to
> > > doforCPE's?
> > >
> > > 4.44-02 if using AP-1000's.
> > > 4.45 otherwise.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jayson A. Baker
> > > Peak Internet Solutions
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> > > On Behalf Of Bruno Lopes F. Cabral
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 6:59 AM
> > > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Most stable 4.x? was Re: What are we all going
to
> > do
> > > forCPE's?
> > >
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > what would be the most stable 4.x version so far?
> > > I mean, to use i.e. on a pair of RG1000s with
> > > SENAO 200mW cards (2511CD+EXT2) on a simple PtP link
> > >
> > > any suggestions on firmware version to choose would
> > > be greatelly appreciated
> > >
> > > TIA, !3runo
> > >
> > > Jayson A. Baker wrote:
> > > > And yes, my biggest complaint is the upgrade to 4.45 on
AP-1000's
> > breaks
> > > the
> > > > 1000's (I posted earlier saying they finally started working,
but
> > they
> > > only
> > > > run for about 5 minutes). Tech support has no idea about it, or
> > what to
> > > do,
> > > > other than to downgrade - real good. You'd think they'd test
it.
> > Glad I
> > > > didn't upgrade our remote sites.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > --
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > --
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
--
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|