Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions

To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:47:00 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
in terms of physical layer (layer 1) - TurboCell and 802.11b is basically
the same - both use DS, etc
TurboCell's difference comes in the MAC layer (layer 2) - mainly in the MAC
layer control mechanism

802.11b uses a MAC control mechanism as CSMA/CA - a rough analogy; modified
Ethernet CSMA/CD
KarlNet uses a MAC control mechansism of dynamic polling - a rough analogy;
token ring

When a few nodes are in a short-range environment, closely together (indoor
wLAN) - CSMA/CA is more efficient
In an outdoor WISP environment, where many nodes are spread throughout a
large radius - polling is a more efficient

-Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of earl@relia.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:03 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions


At the lower levels the Turbo Cell protocol works similar to 802.11b ad-hoc
or point-to-point systems.  Or at least it does not fuction as an AP and
send out 802.11b AP beacon messages.  This may be part of the reason Karlnet
does not do Auto Fallback speeds with Turbo Cell.
I am under the impression it does the polling, NWID and "System Access Pass
Phrase" on top of that.

If this answer is confusing or wrong please ignore.

I also see this same issue when doing a link test on some customers.

Earl Fisher
ReliaNET
earl@relia.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Hrbek [mailto:bhrbek@jagwireless.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:53 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions


Here is my setup

AP-1000 w/ ISP base

RG-1000's w/ SOHO

            Why when I do a link test at a client why do I not only get the
access point but adjacent clients?  If I choose an adjacent client it looks
as if the clients are actually communicating with each other.  It is
something I see all the time and would really like to know why they come up
this way.

Thanks,
Bob Hrbek


_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>