Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] Same song second verse

To: <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Same song second verse
From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:55:32 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
So, you are saying that

A COR 1100 can only talk to 16 RG-1000 w/ TC?

What are the numbers of different clients that you can connect to the
different hardwares.  I realize that is a complicated question but it
doesn't seem to be documented anywere (except in the mind of Charles :)  )

I've heard with the latest FW

AP-1000 w/ TC FW can handle 96 TC (RG-1000) clients.   etc.

Can anybody (probably charles) detail the recommended max numbers for the
different configs (802.11b+, ROR -> ROR, COR -> ROR, COR -> RG?)



-Bob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Same song second verse


> As in TC client, do you mean RG w/ TC?
>
> in that case, it's 16
>
> -Charles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of admin
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:10 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: [Karlnet] Same song second verse
>
>
> Hey guys,
>    Since I can't get an understandable answer for this question on the
> wireless list, I will try here.
>    If I have a COR1100 in COR mode, how many TC clients can it serve? The
> Orinoco web site states 16 ROR's or 32 ORC's per channel. Is it different
> with TC?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Eric L. Johnson
> WarpSpeed Internet
> 1-361-563-3742
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>