CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1/4 inch tubing

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1/4 inch tubing
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 22:17:00 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Why??  A suspended wire vertical would be a lot smaller than 1/8 inch and would work just fine.

Dave   AB7E


On 1/3/2026 7:04 PM, Stan Stockton wrote:
Is the need for 1/4” tubing for 40 meter verticals?

I cannot imagine making a 40m vertical or any other HF vertical or half wavelength 
element that would have anything smaller than 3/8” tubing at the tip.

Stan, K5GO

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 3, 2026, at 8:02 PM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:

I wasn't worried about stiffness.
It is the telescoping to the 1/8" rod. the 0.049, it was pretty tough to get a 
good grip to lock the rod in place too much slop.

Joe WB9SBD

On 1/2/2026 11:54 PM, K9MA wrote:
On 1/2/2026 7:30 PM, Zack Widup wrote:
That's where I have been buying aluminum tubing. They don't have 0.058"
wall thickness in 1/4" diameter tubing, but the closest they have for that
diameter is 0.049", which I suspect will work.
You don't get a whole lot of extra stiffness by going from a .049 to .058 inch 
wall thickness in tubing this small.

73,
Scott K9MA

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>