CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Many US stns out of band (John Dorr)

To: goodwindave.73@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Many US stns out of band (John Dorr)
From: Albert Crespo via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@proton.me>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:52:34 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Just ignore these lids. Too many mouse operators that are have zero expertise. 
Silence is the best response on your part.

Sent from Proton Mail for iOS.

-------- Original Message --------
On Tuesday, 10/28/25 at 17:45 Dave G. ve3kg@myrac.ca <goodwindave.73@gmail.com> 
wrote:
John K1AR said:

“Yes, we only remove the offender's QSO, NOT both. We don't expect ops to
adjudicate OOB QSOs in real-time on the receiving side.”

Great!   That seems like good judgement by the adjudicators.  But they are
missing another aspect:

When I get OOB callers from the US, I often tell them “you’re outside the
US phone band.”   The usual response is silence, but more than a few delete
the QSO from their logs.  In adjudication, I get assessed a penalty for
“NOT IN LOG” QSOs, even though I worked the station.

So, should I work the OOB Yanks, and say nothing?   Should I refuse to log
the OOB Yanks?   Their repeated calls get annoying, sometimes quite
desperate and often a source of QRM.

This is tangly stuff.

73,

Dave VE3KG
(At VE3VN this past weekend)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>