CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio in the Future

To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio in the Future
From: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:54:18 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For CWACs, you want to be able to leverage the log adjudication process of the 
primary contest sponsor. Otherwise, there won't be consistency across the CWACs 
based on a contest as to what was considered to be a valid QSO. The main 
contest sponsor would need to be willing to share a dataset of valid QSOs that 
could be then rescored. Currently, the shared public logs contain all QSOs, 
whether they were determined to be valid or not.

73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn@hornucopia.com)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2025 7:21:18 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio in the Future

But then think of like Plaque sponsors.

A club sponsors an overlay. And anyone that is chasing or entering in 
that overlay sends their log to the sponsoring of the overlay group.

This way you have the overlay and no extra work for the main contest 
organizers.

Joe WB9SBD

On 8/13/2025 2:52 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
> CWACs (Contests Within A Contest) could be more popular if there were
> better ways of reporting the results.  We have some overlays - that's a
> step in the right direction.  Adding more work for the sponsors is probably
> a non-starter at this point, though.
> 73, Ward N0AX
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:07 AM <cq-contest-request@contesting.com> wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:52:12 +0000
>> From: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
>> To: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
>> Cc: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio in the Future
>> Message-ID:
>>          <
>> IA3P223MB176800D16A16B745C42CE63B9C2AA@IA3P223MB1768.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> The things you are proposing could easily be layered over an existing
>> contest. Have at it and let?s see how it works.
>>
>> Randy K5ZD
>>
>>> On Aug 13, 2025, at 3:20?AM, Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> ?Event...Like the 1st one to work W1AAA gets bonus points......The 1st
>> to 50 contacts gets.....  the 1st to 50 mults.....  bonus for low power.
>> Just a few off the top of my head.  Team play where the team that does X
>> 1st or has the cleanest log gets more points.  The options are endless.
>>> This will not be a game for the old guard or a contest for the old
>> guard.  People in general dislike change from the norm, old people are even
>> worse.  It will take a while and some probably will need to pass on before
>> major changes will happen.
>>> W0MU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>