CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ID in NAQP

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ID in NAQP
From: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:56:19 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Because the assisted category was recently added to NAQP, possibly leading some 
operators to assume their callers would just get their calls from spots. 

73,
Scott K9MA 
----------

Scott Ellington

 --- via iPad

> On Aug 20, 2024, at 7:13 AM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> On 8/19/2024 1:43 PM, Jeff Clarke wrote:
>> Why single out NAQP only now?
> 
> Because NAQP was established many years ago as a low power, unassisted 
> contest, which established its character. Most of us liked it that way -- 
> Rules favored the little guns. Now, we see it becoming just like any other 
> contest, with  Rules favoring the best stations, and the worst of them 
> abusing good operating practice. Spotting HAS, sadly, changed the nature of 
> this contest, and not for the better.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>