My two cents , a top entry should be required to identify the station they
operated from, if different than their home station…..and 95+ % of the
operators already do….I just dont understand the secrecy, but sooner or later
the suspect logs will be made public, then the real crowd sourcing can begin….
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 6, 2024, at 8:43 PM, Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org> wrote:
>
> It seems there should at least *be a way* for the station call to be listed
> in the final results (if desired), same as there is in the 3830 results? Not
> necessarily a requirement.
>
> -Steve K8LX
>
>> On 03/06/24 6:57 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>> 3830 scores has a field for the station's callsign. I have never operated
>> remotely but whenever I guest op in the Caribbean I always list the station
>> owner with my score. Of course if it was a field day type setup there would
>> be no station callsign other than the one issued to me.
>>
>> Are you proposing that the physical address or coordinates of the
>> transmitter be required with a log submission? How often has the QTH really
>> been in question? The ARRL already requires a grid locator to submit a log
>> which gets you pretty close to the actual physical location.
>>
>> John KK9A
>>
>>
>> Edward Sawyer N1UR wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> It brings up an interesting point. Nowhere does any contest organizer
>> actually require a disclosure of what station location you operated from.
>> In these days of remote, I think that should change.
>>
>> Ed N1UR
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|