Hi,
As far as I can remember, I didn't saw any serious competitors operating this
way but only part time activity and/or casual operators.
It seems to be less experienced operators who have probably not read the
rules...
73, Dimitri F4DSK
Le 15 nov. 2023 à 00:41, à 00:41, john@kk9a.com a écrit:
>Apparently these serious competitors knew leaving off part of the
>exchange
>would be accepted or they would not have spent the weekend operating
>that
>way. I have never operated the WAE RTTY contest however in other RTTY
>contests stations frequently send a lot of unneeded information. I
>think
>more time could be saved by cleaning up macros than not sending
>pertinent
>information. Perhaps everyone should respond by sending "RST? RST?".
>
>John KK9A
>
>
>Hans K0HB wrote:
>
>During the WAE RTTY test this past weekend I came across a small
>handful of
>stations which did not include a signal report (RST) in the report.
>Two of
>the stations were well known USA "competitors" who were on the air all
>weekend long.
>
>Below is an exchange of emails with the contest manager who seems not
>concerned about my inquiry. His attitude seems to be "it happens all
>the
>time so we let it slide".
>
>73, de Hans, K0HB
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|