CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [FOC-members] Musing about my CQWW CW Log Checking Repo

To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [FOC-members] Musing about my CQWW CW Log Checking Report
From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 09:41:58 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I reviewed my LCR, as well.  As usual, about 10% of those I worked lost
points for busting my zone (4), including several top ten guys.

Two reasons for this, both easily preventable:
1.  Copy what you hear and don't assume the prefill is correct.
2.  Update your CTY file just before the contest.  I *am* listed as a
callsign exception in zone 4 in the CTY file released the day before CQWW
CW 2022.  In older ones, I wasn't.

Barry W2UP

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 9:31 AM David Bunte <dpbunte@gmail.com> wrote:

> George -
>
> I am not a contester, but enjoy dabbling a bit. You may get more helpful
> comments from other members, but here is my take. I would not be keen on #3
> either, although I chose my current call because K9LIH was often
> 'busted'... then I realized that it was sometimes ME who busted it, so I
> could not blame all of the errors on others.
>
> I don't rag chew at 34 wpm like some folks I know and admire, but 34 wpm
> does not sound too fast in a contest. Solution #1 or #2 might help reduce
> problems for the other stations, but might also reduce your QSO total
> somewhat... but the reduction in errors might be an appropriate trade-off.
> If you find that you are needed to repeat your call, very often that would
> be a clue that a somewhat slower speed might be worth it.
>
> Whatever you do... enjoy, and I'll call you when I hear you, even if in a
> contest... HI.
>
> 161 de Dave - K9FN
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:21 AM George VA2EBI <george.harlem@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I used to be baffled by the number of Not In Log’s in my LCR, but almost
> > as many stations get a NIL from me.  Part of contest logging, I guess.
> My
> > stats were well below median figures for Error Rate and Score Reduction.
> > But there were 81 stations busting my call out of 1174 QSO’s.  The most
> > common error was “VA2EDI”.  I get it—I did the contest at an average 34
> > wpm.  The following adjustments occur to me:
> >
> > 1.  Send at a lower average CW speed
> > 2.  Send my call (in N1MM) with a partial speed reduction, as in
> > “VA2>>EBI<<“
> > 3.  Obtain a new 2X2 contest call
> > 4.  Do nothing differently at all
> >
> > I’m not really keen for Choice #3.  Any comments are welcome.
> >
> > George VA2EBI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From George's iPhone
> > _._,_._,_
> > ------------------------------
> > Groups.io Links:
> >
> > You receive all messages sent to this group.
> >
> > View/Reply Online (#4274)
> > <https://FOC-members.groups.io/g/main/message/4274> | Reply To Group
> > <
> main@FOC-members.groups.io?subject=Re:%20%5BFOC-members%5D%20Musing%20about%20my%20CQWW%20CW%20Log%20Checking%20Report
> >
> > | Reply To Sender
> > <
> george.harlem@gmail.com?subject=Private:%20Re:%20%5BFOC-members%5D%20Musing%20about%20my%20CQWW%20CW%20Log%20Checking%20Report
> >
> > | Mute This Topic <https://groups.io/mt/98664231/652852> | New Topic
> > <https://FOC-members.groups.io/g/main/post>
> > Your Subscription <https://FOC-members.groups.io/g/main/editsub/652852>
> | Contact
> > Group Owner <main+owner@FOC-members.groups.io> | Unsubscribe
> > <
> https://FOC-members.groups.io/g/main/leave/11629545/652852/1048660302/xyzzy
> >
> > [dpbunte@gmail.com]
> > _._,_._,_
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>