CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M CW

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 6M CW
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:47:05 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 25/10/2022 19:14, David Gilbert AB7E wrote:

<snip>

Calling FT8 an "existential threat to ham radio" is ludicrous no matter how much you or I may dislike it.  Anything that encourages lots of activity like FT8 does is exactly the opposite.

Dave is right, insofar as anything that hams care to transmit, or cause to be transmitted, on the ham bands may be described as ham radio, and insofar as "lots of activity", regardless of how it's generated, is inherently good in itself.

All the same, your computer talking to my computer over ham-band RF leaves me cold.  And, yes, that includes RTTY.

73,
Paul EI5DI



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>