CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FOC QP

To: 'CQ-Contest' <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Peter Voelpel <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FOC QP
From: Keith Dutson <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:01:35 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Is accuracy really necessary for a signal report.
73, Keith NM5G
    On Saturday, March 26, 2022, 04:14:48 PM CDT, Peter Voelpel 
<dj7ww@t-online.de> wrote:  
 
 Must be very difficult to find a transceiver with a real S-meter.
I never had one, they all showed numbers far from the truth.

73
Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Hans Brakob
Sent: Samstag, 26. März 2022 16:55
To: CQ-Contest
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FOC QP

Made a couple dozen contacts in the FOC QSO party last night (I’m not a
member.)

Two things that I noticed.

They’re a friendly crowd.  They give real signal reports, like 579 and 549.

73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”™
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>