CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast
From: Ray Mikula <rmikula@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 12:57:33 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have an informal Competition with a ham who lives on the East Coast 
(Richmond, VA).   I live in the Midwest (Chicago Northern Suburbs).  In last 
weeks CQ WW DX SSB contest, he outdid me with many more multipliers.  He had 63 
more multipliers on 15M and 92 more multipliers on 10M.  What is interesting 
and frustrating is that we were both doing S&P (no running at all).  I was 
operating assisted using the cluster spotting in N1MM and I was very heavily 
focused on multipliers.  He, on the other hand was listening up and down the 
bands, snagging contacts.

So, what I’m trying to figure out is how he ended up with so many more 
multipliers.  Is this the difference between East coast and the Midwest 
propagation?  Or is it my approach?  Could it be that I missed so many 
multipliers because they never showed up as spots?  I would have thought that 
almost everyone that was running would likely get spotted but perhaps that was 
a really bad assumption.

Overall, we are both little pistols.  His station my have a slight edge as his 
beam is at 40 feet vs my 35 feet but that is about it.

So, two questions.  

If one is running assisted what balance of clicking multiplier spots vs. tuning 
up and down the dial tends to be most productive in snagging multipliers?

Second, how much of a difference is there between working a world wide contest 
from the Midwest vs. the East coast?

Any insights would be appreciated.

73,
Ray Mikula  (W9NZ)

Sent from Mail for Windows

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>