As one of the organizers and operators of the RBN, I shudder at the
thought of trying to manage an opt-out system. Our servers are already
stressed during major contests, and the idea of passing every spot
through a filter against a list of don't-spot-mes before it is
disseminated, as well as the administrative load of accepting, listing,
updating and deleting calls from the list, is not how any of us want to
spend our time.
I doubt that there are very many people who share your downside view of
being spotted. At worst, it seems to me you get multiple callers at
once, which is a bit more work, or rather handling them is a skill we
should try to develop. I think there's even an upside - people who make
use of spots and tools like the N1MM Spectrum Display will realize that
you are running on a frequency, and will tend to avoid it when looking
for a place to CQ themselves.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at <http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 8/23/2021 4:01 PM, Joe wrote:
As someone who has zero clue as to how the RBN system works.
I can surely tell when one grabs me, I see it in N1MM and then
suddenly the freq, well I can say some times I'm happy it spotted me
and others well you see the spot come through and know shortly the
freq is gonna go to hell.
I wonder, if the RBN's could be made to work with a call list of who
wants to be spotted,
This way the RBN has a list of clean calls to work with. if it copies
something on the list is tells everyone. if it does not have a match
then it ignores it.
This cures the bad copy problem, AND for those that do NOT want to be
spotted for the above mentioned reason, they can make sure their call
is not on the official list so they won't get spotted.
Possible?
Thoughts?
etc...
Joe WB9SBD
On 8/23/2021 12:50 PM, w1rm@comcast.net wrote:
Now this is going to sound odd coming from a die-hard CW guy but as
one who
sips the cup of RBN CW spots, I can tell you there is need for a lot of
improvement in that technology. Voice RBN would be scary! If there
were
voice RBN actually put into production I would hope the stations who
relay
those spots offer the ability to turn them off!
I know there have been attempts to better filter CW RBN and yet I
still see
a lot of broken CW spots. Broken because they are inaccurate. CW RBN
does
not have any real intelligence yet so spots for things like EZ get
through
(E7 ops probably sending way too fast or badly), even though there is no
legal hamming in EZ. I see a lot of spots for TN's too, but they are
broken
calls thanks to less that proper sending.
I have done enough SSB contesting to know how hard it is to pull the
correct
call out, especially when the op on the other side doesn't speak
clearly,
has muffled or distorted audio, has massive background noise or echo,
just
to name a few of the challenges. My hat's off to those of you who
operate
phone contests and do it well. The folks who do DXpeditions are even
more
to be congratulated!
This one needs to be done like great BBQ, low and slow (:->)
Pete Chamalian, W1RM
W1rm@comcast.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|