CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.

To: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.
From: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:52:36 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Remarkably well stated, Dave.

73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”™
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on 
behalf of David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 7:47 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Past Prediction of the Future of Contesting.


In my opinion, there isn't anything at all wrong with digital modes.
There is LOTS wrong with mixing digital modes and other modes in the
same contest, though.

73,
Dave   AB7E




On 8/22/2021 5:11 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
>
>
> There has to be limits - I suggest a digital non-proliferation treaty
> might be in order.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>