CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"
From: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:57:19 -0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
2BSIQ was actually implemented, when conditions allowed for it, way before
2016.
It didn't have that name though.

https://cqww.com/publiclogs/2009cw/lp1h.log

73,

Martin, LU5DX

El vie., 19 mar. 2021 9:24 a. m., <john@kk9a.com> escribió:

> I believe most CQ-Contest readers do know what 2BSIQ is. CT1BOH gave
> it that name after the 2016 CQWW CW contest and the acronym has been
> mentioned on this list over 130 times.  How many operators can do it
> well?  I suspect not many.
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> Ron W3WN wrote
>
> In Jim’s defense... I can believe him.  I didn’t know what the acronym
> stood for, either.
>
> And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> > OZ2I Henning  wrote:
> >
> > K9YC, Jim
>
> > And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
> > just point something out !
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>