CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"

To: OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"
From: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:54:47 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In Jim’s defense... I can believe him.  I didn’t know what the acronym stood 
for, either.  

And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.

73, ron w3wn 

> On Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote:
> 
> @K9YC Jim
> And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
> just point something out !
> 
> Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . .
> Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ?
> Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line?
> I think it is all about sorting the final results.
> 
> Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -
> https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf
> 
> -----------------------------------
> * Vy 73 de OZ2I  Henning *
> -----------------------------------
> 
> 
> Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com
>> :
> 
>>> On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
>>> It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be dominated
>> by those ops capable of 2BSIQ.
>> 
>> What is 2BSIQ?
>> 
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>