In Jim’s defense... I can believe him. I didn’t know what the acronym stood
for, either.
And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
73, ron w3wn
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 6:07 PM, OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk> wrote:
>
> @K9YC Jim
> And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
> just point something out !
>
> Categories and Assisted and SO2R and . . . .
> Isn't it all about the way results are presented to the public ?
> Why is it so hard to make OVERLAYs and put the results on-line?
> I think it is all about sorting the final results.
>
> Take a look of the listings in the SAC Booklet 2020 -
> https://www.sactest.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Booklet-2020.pdf
>
> -----------------------------------
> * Vy 73 de OZ2I Henning *
> -----------------------------------
>
>
> Den tor. 18. mar. 2021 kl. 17.11 skrev Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com
>> :
>
>>> On 3/17/2021 2:06 PM, ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest wrote:
>>> It seems the top scores in CW contesting from now on will be dominated
>> by those ops capable of 2BSIQ.
>>
>> What is 2BSIQ?
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|