CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion!
From: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:09:17 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I really like WPX. It's just too bad the CW one is in the northern summer, when the weather is nice and the propagation isn't.


73,
Scott K9MA



On 12/4/2020 8:38 AM, N4ZR wrote:
Well, sort of.  The WPX mults make for a unique profile.  One could still use band/zones as mults in the "new CQWWCW".

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 12/4/2020 7:03 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
CQ already has a world wide contest with serial numbers in the exchange.

John KK9A



N4ZR wrote:

They still need to do something about the CQWW
exchange. With zones, it's just a callsign-copying contest.  I'm for
serial numbers.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


--
Scott  K9MA

k9ma@sdellington.us

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>