Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update

[robert wa1fcn <wa1fcn@charter.net>]

    GM Ria

        Well you say "You can't beat Maine"  I do hope that is not 
completely true.
        I have tried 3 years in a row to have top Low power Single Band 
40 meter
        USA score in WPX CW.

        I have been beaten by the same person  two years in a row.  Yes 
he lives
        in Maine. Thing is YES I am going to try again.  (I am in 
Alabama) only this
        year I'll be a guest op at a local station with a much better 
antenna system.
        My 2 element 40 at 70 ft  just doesn't seem to have enough  push.

        So I'll hope "You can't beat Maine" doesn't hold true. You say 
the difference
        is significant from W2 to Maine ....... try it from Alabama.

           All the best     BoB WA1FCN


On 1/22/2020 10:21 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
> The problem I have is that W2 competes with all of W1, including
> Maine. You can't beat Maine. The difference is significant even though
> both are East coast.
>
> When they had it in the US, it went by US call districts which made more sense.
>
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 22:35, ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com> wrote:
> > Joe,You don't have to have a big station to compete.  If you do low power you 
> > will only compete against other low power stations. Bryant, KG5HVO is in first 
> > place in my region NA5. He has done a bunch of low power efforts with little 
> > competition and has got the maximum points for those contests. His score is 
> > higher than the top HP station K4AB, which has a big station. But to be fair to 
> > Larry he hasn't done as many contests and will probably leap back to 1st 
> > place.JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> > -------- Original message --------From: Joe <nss@mwt.net> Date: 1/22/20  8:18 PM  
> > (GMT-05:00) To: Claudio Veroli <claudio.veroli@alice.it>, cq-contest@contesting.com 
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update I just love this WRTC 
> > Competition.Well at least the part where they all use almost the same modest stations 
> > part.And that's just it. (I'm puttying my Flame retardant suit on now)  I would like to see 
> > this Qualification procedure run say two ways.Divide them up, 1/2 as it is now, anything 
> > goes, balls to the wall competition. Mega super stations and all that. Giant towers stacked 
> > yagis etc..Then the other half,  have the qualification be like the stations they will be 
> > using.A 3 element tribander at like 40 feet or less, and dipoles. and barefoot rigs. Of 
> > course no spotting too.I bet there are quite a few operators out there that are just as 
> > good and even possibly better than many of the guys that get to go, but these other guys 
> > never will be able to go bec
>   ause their stations just cant compete with multiple stacked towers etc.Level the Qualification playing field some too. for at least 1/2 the 
> field,that would be a neat experiment yes?Joe WB9SBDSigThe Original Rolling Ball ClockIdle TymeIdle-Tyme.comhttp://www.idle-tyme.comOn 
> 1/22/2020 7:40 AM, Claudio Veroli wrote:>   An important update to the qualification standings is available.>> It includes:>> 
> CQWW CW 2019 Claimed scores added> CQWW SSB 2019 Claimed scores added.> RUSSIAN DX CONTEST 2019 Final scores added> IARU HF 2019 
> Final scores added> CQWW WPX CW 2019 Final scores added.> ARRL DX CW 2019 final scores (fixed)>> Please visit, share and support 
> WRTC2022 at www.wrtc2022.it>> 73 de Claudio I4VEQ>>> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing 
> list> CQ-Contest@contesting.com> 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing 
> listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailm
>   an/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest