CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] There goes the Clean Sweep

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] There goes the Clean Sweep
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:22:40 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I'm no fan of the ARRL in general, and I can think of reasons not to get serious about any particular contest, but boycotting one in which I would otherwise participate simply because I didn't get to use a particular exchange wouldn't be one of those reasons.

Dave   AB7E


On 1/3/2020 3:43 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote:
Although I did not enjoy the slag by Pete, he's actually right.  Folks in
general (there are exceptions) don't enjoy having to send "MAR" when they
could be sending PE, NB or NS, so participation is a little lower for
SS/ARRL160 and CQP up here with good reason.

Everyone else in NA gets to do this.  Some states/provinces have multiple
sections.

So, while Pete seemingly forgot about me, VE9CB, VE9HF, VE9DX, VE9XX, VE9ML
and everyone else in NB..until the ARRL allows me to send "NB" (where I
really am) I won't make much of (or any) showing in the ARRL160 or
Sweepstakes. (ditto the California QP)..the last 3 holdouts worldwide
clinging tenuously to RAC "sections."

Mike VE9AA "New Brunswick"

Mike, Coreen & Corey

Keswick Ridge, NB


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>