You don’t need multiple rigs...or multiple copies of the software to do
it....one copy of the software will do it, if set for dxpedition mode, I think
the most I saw was 5 at one time...3 at a time is usually 3 different TX audio
streams, when you go more than 3 you’ll get 2 stations on the same audio freq,
one getting a RR73 and one getting a signal report....
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:19 PM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:
>
>
> Well, I've read the contest rules several times, and they don't specifically
> make the same "one signal per band" limitation for single op that they do for
> multiop. I agree that it is assumed, but again ... the rules don't
> specifically rule it out and we all know from past experience that loopholes
> tend to be exploited.
>
> And I am absolutely certain that these were three separate QSOs with three
> different stations. I should have taken a screenshot. The contacts were
> within the same 15 second window, with different stations, and with different
> signal reports. And as I said, it happened again a short while later with
> two completely different stations. These were not images, and they were not
> the staggered transmissions that we can do while overlapping more than one
> contact.
>
> I'm pretty sure you can run multiple instances of WSJT-X as long as you
> specify different rigs for each. If you check out 5T5PA's page at QRZ.com
> you can clearly see that he is a pretty smart guy and that he has multiple
> rigs. Probably the simplest way would be to use three instances of WSJT-X
> driving the same sound card and talking to three rigs via different com ports.
>
> Regarding DXCC eligibility, what I saw did not appear to be any more
> automated than normal FT8 contacts. They didn't need to be. If he called CQ
> on three different frequencies, WSJT-X handles everything from that point on
> if he clicked the "Call 1st" box. He would still have to manually enable the
> next CQ's, but that wouldn't be difficult to quickly do three times.
>
> I think it's all kind of clever, but I wouldn't want to see it in the contest.
>
> 73,
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>> On 8/6/2019 1:17 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
>> Dave - is this actually REALLY quickly synchronized separate transmissions
>> to 3 different stations? Or are there 3 simultaneous transmissions
>> occurring at exactly the same time? If it’s the former, its certainly
>> serial single op worthy - I do this all the time while contesting - just not
>> as fast as a computer. If it’s the later, then it would be "more than one
>> signal at a time". That would violate current rules in all categories I
>> believe. Even Multi-Op stations can only have one signal at a time on a
>> distinct band. Of course I am assuming that a "signal" is the roughly 50hz
>> of individual beeps and not the 3khz of computer managed bandwidth. All
>> definitions to be finalized with this new breed of contest category.
>> Illustrating how non-human controlled it really is.
>>
>> Interestingly, and on a different subject, whether 5T5PA is actually
>> compliant with the new DXCC rules making such contacts ineligible for DXCC
>> is another topic. I believe that the next contact cannot be made without a
>> human engagement. So was it semi-automatic or automatic fire? And is that
>> engagement needed as part of a "stack build" or real time - the initial DXCC
>> language was not too clear.
>>
>> Ed N1UR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> David Gilbert
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 3:10 PM
>> To: 'CQ-Contest@contesting. com'
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification
>>
>>
>> Although it is certainly implied, the rules listed on the WW-Digi website do
>> not specifically prohibit using more than one signal at the same time ON THE
>> SAME BAND for the single op category. They say that transmission can only
>> be on one band at a time, but they don't say you can't make multiple
>> transmissions at the same time on the same band.
>>
>> The reason I bring this up is that I just witnessed 5T5PA making three
>> separate FT8 transmissions on 20m to three different stations all within the
>> same fifteen second window. A short time later I saw two separate
>> transmissions from him to two different stations (and different stations
>> than the previous three), again all within the same fifteen second window.
>> Each simultaneous transmission was spaced exactly 60 Hz apart, and the
>> software cleanly decoded all signals as if they were from different
>> callsigns. 5T5PA expertly managed all the QSOs cleanly.
>>
>> Interestingly enough, even though I've worked 5T5PA before, JTAlert only
>> labeled one of the three as a dupe.
>>
>> I can think of more than a couple of ways 5T5PA could be doing this, and for
>> casual operation I see no problem with it. For a DXpedition, it might even
>> make a lot of sense. I don't remember it being against FCC/other laws, but
>> I could be wrong about that. In any case, it seems to me that it could open
>> up the possibility for some controversy in a contest.
>>
>> Or maybe I'm just crying wolf here ...
>>
>> 73,
>> Dave AB7E
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|