I think that IARU Region 1 bandplan only allows digimodes from 7040-7060. Yes,
I know that FT8 is a camels nose in the tent at 7074, but they are pushing back
on FT4.
Just my understanding, so “for what it’s worth”.
73, de Hans, KØHB
“Just a Boy and his Radio”
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Jamie WW3S
<ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 9:03 PM
To: donovanf@starpower.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
Cc: k1jt
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency
Not sure what the ARRL directors can do, other than suggest a different
freq (I think above 7.100 would be great). I think the software
developers, users, and contest organizers would be the ones to suggest
"the move"
------ Original Message ------
From: donovanf@starpower.net
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Cc: "k1jt" <k1jt@arrl.net>
Sent: 8/5/2019 10:34:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency
>I fully support K9YC's recommendation that ARRL members contact
>their directors so that they become aware of the need to quickly act
>force a change in the unfortunate choice of 7047.5 kHz for routine
>and rapidly growing FT4 activity.
>
>
>73
>Frank
>W3LPL
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: donovanf@starpower.net
>To: "PVRC Mailman" <pvrc@mailman.qth.net>
>Cc: "k1jt" <k1jt@arrl.net>, "W3TOM" <w3tom@arrl.org>, w2ru@arrl.org
>Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 2:29:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency
>
>
>What are PVRC members opinions and recommendations about the
>unwise choice of 7047.5 kHz for FT4 activity? While the FT4
>development team naively expected FT4 to be used only during
>contests, inevitably FT4 use is rapidly growing for routine QSOs.
>
>
>
>In my opinion the obvious 40 meter FT4 frequency range is in
>the much more lightly used 7100-7125 kHz segment.
>
>
>Something must be done soon.
>
>
>73
>Frank
>W3LPL
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: "Jim Brown" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
>To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, August 5, 2019 7:57:41 AM
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] 40M FT4 Frequency
>
>7047 has been chosen, and many fans of WSJT modes have observed that
>it's likely to start a war. That range is widely used by W1AW, state QSO
>parties, QRP and QRS operation, county hunters, most CW contests, and
>many others. Sure, the WSJT team think it's only for contests, but if
>you build it, they will come, and they are coming. I had QRM from FT4
>operators during NAQP CW.
>
>I am a huge fan of the work of K1JT and his team (I use FT8 extensively
>on 160M and 6M), but they ain't perfect, and this is a massive screw-up.
>The default 40M FT4 frequency ought to be somewhere north of 7070 kHz.
>OTOH, I have no issue with the DXpedition mode frequency around 7058. I
>urge all contest clubs to contact both the WSJT team and their ARRL
>representatives about this.
>
>73, Jim K9YC
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|