CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Possible changes for CQ VHF Contest

To: "CQ-Contest@contesting.com" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Possible changes for CQ VHF Contest
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:06:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Actually, the propagation is the same on the West Coast as it is on the East 
Coast.  The issue is the lack of DX participation in Japan, China, India, 
Australia, Indonesia, etc that rivals Europe.  If there was even half the 
participation in said region as there is in Europe, we wouldn't be having this 
conversation on East vs West Coast all the time.

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
egruff@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 6:01 PM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Possible changes for CQ VHF Contest

All,


I feel like I am fighting the same battle on alternate fronts here. It's either 
"FT8 isn't real radio and shouldn't be allowed" or "No one needs to run 1500 W 
to work DX". The common thread is that the originators of these messages are 
almost exclusively hams on the East Coast (where I grew up and operated for the 
first 13 years or so as a ham, so I have no inherent bias against you guys, I 
promise).

 

You have to understand that propagation from the western half of the US is 
NOTHING like it is where you live. On some bands, we haven't heard Europe in a 
year or more. This includes 12, 10 and 6 Meters. On 160 M, it takes a kW+ to 
work Europe most nights, and FT8/JT65 are often the only modes that are 
sensitive enough to pick them up. I have frequently reviewed my logs for 160, 
80, 10 and 6 Meters, and more than half the contacts I've made in the past 
three years (nadir of Solar Cycle 24) were with stations that were weaker than 
-15 dB on digital modes. This is the commonly-accepted threshold for being able 
to hear CW. So, without the weak-signal modes, I wouldn't have made the 
contacts. It's great that you all are 2000 miles or less from most of Europe, 
but remember that we are at least 5000 miles from the continent. I'm not going 
to give up the chance to work new countries because "it's not CW or SSB", and I 
suspect none of you would either.

 

For contests, a very similar situation exists. I am a semiserious contester and 
prefer CW to all other modes. However, for multimode contests, I can't hear, 
much less work many of the stations that you all work easily. While
FT8 is painfully slow compared to CW or SSB, at some point I can pick up many 
more QSOs and some multipliers at the cost of a much lower rate with FT8. 
Again, why shouldn't I take advantage of the opportunity instead of turning off 
the radio? This weekend's CQ WW VHF contest was a great example.
In 4 hours that I had to operate, I made 15 CW and 5 or so SSB QSOs, all in TX 
and FL. I was able to make 40 FT8 QSOs within the same window, many of which 
were new grids in the contest. Looking at my log, fully 75% of them were below 
the -15 dB threshold for CW. I bet that most of you East Coasters were able to 
make more QSOs in one hour than I did in 4 and probably had twice as many 
multipliers.

 

I'd love to impose a rule that before anyone can bitch about FT8, they should 
have to run a contest from the West Coast. If you can get within 25% of your 
score in the same contest from a prior year at your home QTH, I'll take out a 
full-page ad in the newpaper of your choice to trumpet your opinion. You guys 
just don't know how much better it is there. There is a reason why there are 
fewer than two dozen 6 M DXCC awards earned by West Coast stations since the 
award started. Some of us have multiple towers, big yagis or stacks and run 
full QRO. You can argue how we do so much better to Japan, and that's true, but 
it's ONE country. We also occasionally can work China, Taiwan, S Korea and 
VK/ZL, but that's about it and they are 6000+ miles away. Certainly not the 
number of entities that are within 2000 miles of you guys.

 

So, the next time you want to complain about why anyone would want to use FT8, 
consider that we're all not as fortunate as you. It's far worse for our fellow 
hams in KH6 and KL7. It's a great weak-signal mode that has a place in radio. 
I'll never give up CW (phone is another story), but I have no intention of 
quitting FT8 either and neither do many of my friends on this side of the 
country. All we're asking is that you show a little consideration for others 
that are in less favorable QTHs.

 

73,

 

Eric NC6K

 

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>