I third the sugjestion of the RG400 small enough for all the switching in
a more then one radio setup.
The tight bend radius the small diameter make for a clean instlation that
coupled with the double shielding it’s a WIN WIN
Watch Ebay or other surplus suppliers
Wayne W3EA
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of charlie
carroll <k1xx@k1xx.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:23:06 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
Keith:
A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is
double shielded while 303 is single. They're good as interconnects
because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG-400 uses
multi-strands of copper for the center conductor; RG-300 uses copper
clad steel. Either will handle 1500 watts at HF.
73 charlie, k1xx
On 3/12/2019 7:51 PM, Keith Dutson wrote:
> My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new
> digs. I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power
> meter, tuner and switch. I have heard there may be a smaller cable that has
> very little loss, but handles 1500 watts. I would appreciate any comments
> on what is being used today. Thanks.
>
> 73, Keith NM5G
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|