CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB

To: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB
From: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 13:50:59 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My general feeling is that ham radio peaked in several periods and the
interest was retained among those who were there during the peaks. Others
just fell off.

So your survey of checks reflects that.

73
Ria
N2RJ

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:

> Kind of looking at the log from last november antuicipating the results
> any day now. But something I noticed was interesting on the CK Numbers
> we worked. And how many,, Check this out.
>
> Sweepstakes Checks
> Check  QSOs    Pct
> ----------------------
>    00     9     1.6
>    01     2     0.4
>    02     6     1.1
>    03     4     0.7
>    04     3     0.5
>    05     2     0.4
>    06     2     0.4
>    07     3     0.5
>    08     4     0.7
>    09     3     0.5
>    10     2     0.4
>    11     3     0.5
>    12     4     0.7
>    13     7     1.2
>    14     5     0.9
>    15     8     1.4
>    16     9     1.6
>    17     6     1.1
>    18     0     0.0
>    19     0     0.0
>    20     0     0.0
>    21     0     0.0
>    22     0     0.0
>    23     0     0.0
>    24     1     0.2
>    25     0     0.0
>    26     0     0.0
>    27     0     0.0
>    28     0     0.0
>    29     0     0.0
>    30     1     0.2
>    31     2     0.4
>    32     1     0.2
>    33     1     0.2
>    34     0     0.0
>    35     0     0.0
>    36     0     0.0
>    37     0     0.0
>    38     0     0.0
>    39     0     0.0
>    40     1     0.2
>    41     0     0.0
>    42     0     0.0
>    43     0     0.0
>    44     0     0.0
>    45     0     0.0
>    46     0     0.0
>    47     2     0.4
>    48     3     0.5
>    49     1     0.2
>    50     0     0.0
>    51     1     0.2
>    52     6     1.1
>    53     4     0.7
>    54     7     1.2
>    55     7     1.2
>    56     6     1.1
>    57     9     1.6
>    58     8     1.4
>    59    20     3.5
>    60    16     2.8
>    61    19     3.4
>    62    20     3.5
>    63    19     3.4
>    64    12     2.1
>    65    13     2.3
>    66    12     2.1
>    67    16     2.8
>    68    12     2.1
>    69    17     3.0
>    70    13     2.3
>    71    11     1.9
>    72    10     1.8
>    73    13     2.3
>    74     9     1.6
>    75    11     1.9
>    76    24     4.2
>    77    16     2.8
>    78     9     1.6
>    79    11     1.9
>    80     4     0.7
>    81     5     0.9
>    82     3     0.5
>    83     8     1.4
>    84     4     0.7
>    85     4     0.7
>    86     6     1.1
>    87     7     1.2
>    88     2     0.4
>    89    11     1.9
>    90     7     1.2
>    91    15     2.7
>    92     7     1.2
>    93     6     1.1
>    94     4     0.7
>    95     5     0.9
>    96     8     1.4
>    97     4     0.7
>    98     5     0.9
>    99     5     0.9
>
> Everything is in the single digits till 1958/59 What happened then? WOW!
> and then in 1980 it fell apart again.
>
> what changed on those dates?
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> --
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>