To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:31:12 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 7/27/2017 8:44 PM, Charles Harpole wrote: Remote stations should never be used in a contest. The length of the mic/key wire matters. Be on-site or be gone. And the logic behind this statement is ????? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I, Ria Jairam |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I, Jeff Stai |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op?, Paul O'Kane |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |