CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] `150 watt limit question

To: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>, Frank Donovan <donovanf@starpower.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] `150 watt limit question
From: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:36:01 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My FTdx5000 is a 200W rig.

But I can throttle it back to as low as 10W max output,  in 10W increments.

I presume other rigs have a similar “governor”.

73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a boy and his radio"™

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Geiger &amp;lt;af5cc2@gmail.com&amp;gt;
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector &amp;lt;cq-contest@contesting.com&amp;gt;
> Sent: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:19:36 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] `150 watt limit question
>
> It appears that for the ARRL contest, and maybe for CQ contest, 150 watts
> is the break point between high and low power.  Does anyone know why that
> limit was set?  It would seem that changing it to 200 watts would make more
> sense, in that low power would be barefoot, and high power would be with an
> amp (or with a Yaesu FTDX9000MP barefoot).
>
> It seems that there are 3 radios that doe 150 watts barefoot-the Kenwood
> TS950, the Icom 781, and the JRC JST-245.
>
> There are quite a few radios that do 200 watts barefoot-Yaesu FT1000D,
> Yaesu FT1000MP MK5, Yaesu FT2000D, Yaesu FTDX9000D, Yaesu FTDX9000C, Yaesu
> FTDX5000, Icom 775, Icom 7800, Icom 7700, Icom 7851, Kenwood TS990.
>
> That is one reason why 200 watts seems to be a more logical dividing point,
> but what do I know?
>
> 73 John AF5CC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>