In 1959, my first Field Day, 150 watts input power was one of the multiplier
categories.
During the 1960s it was hanged to 200 watts input power
Twenty years later is was changed again, to today's 150 watt output power
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: donovanf@starpower.net
To: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:39:47 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] `150 watt limit question
Back in the 1950s and 1960s a pair of 807s or 6146s ran 150 watts INPUT.
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: John Geiger &lt;af5cc2@gmail.com&gt;
To: CQ-Contest Reflector &lt;cq-contest@contesting.com&gt;
Sent: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:19:36 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] `150 watt limit question
It appears that for the ARRL contest, and maybe for CQ contest, 150 watts
is the break point between high and low power. Does anyone know why that
limit was set? It would seem that changing it to 200 watts would make more
sense, in that low power would be barefoot, and high power would be with an
amp (or with a Yaesu FTDX9000MP barefoot).
It seems that there are 3 radios that doe 150 watts barefoot-the Kenwood
TS950, the Icom 781, and the JRC JST-245.
There are quite a few radios that do 200 watts barefoot-Yaesu FT1000D,
Yaesu FT1000MP MK5, Yaesu FT2000D, Yaesu FTDX9000D, Yaesu FTDX9000C, Yaesu
FTDX5000, Icom 775, Icom 7800, Icom 7700, Icom 7851, Kenwood TS990.
That is one reason why 200 watts seems to be a more logical dividing point,
but what do I know?
73 John AF5CC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|