CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be br

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be breaking any rule in all contests
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 16:54:48 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Please note, I said *criteria.*     It would be a simple table, like

What gets you a warning.

    1-5 solicited or self spots

1-5 10-minute rule violations

What gets you a DQ the first time.

More than 5 self-spots

    More than 5 10-minute violations

Log padding, less than 10 QSOs

What gets you a DQ for more than one year

Log padding of more than 10 QSOs

    Second op at a station entered as single op


...And so on

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 4/14/2017 10:43 AM, Ria Jairam wrote:
I"m not sure what a hall of shame online would accomplish, but I guess if
you want to go zero tolerance with rules violations this would be the way
to go.

My only stipulation is that the rules violation has to be deliberate, and
not accidental.

73, Ria, N2RJ

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net> wrote:

Bravo, Mike.  Let me extend the thought a bit further. The CQWW Committee
needs to be transparent and specific about its criteria for various
actions. What warrants a warning, versus what warrants a DQ? What repeated
infractions from one year to the next warrant a DQ?

  The old yellow card/red card system was an attempt at this.  Nobody is
asking *how* they caught the cheaters, just what the penalties are for
various offenses, either current or repeated. That's the only way they will
get pastthe perception that they are being arbitrary, favoring a particular
nationality and so on.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.


On 4/13/2017 7:25 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:

CQ chose only to publish stations that were Disqualified.

How about a list of all stations that were found to have broken a rule(s)
and the penalty for doing so.

How about a lot more transparency.

Just a thought.

W0MU



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>