CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.

To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:08:44 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
IMO, this is where the whole notion some have that "the CC doesn't need to
explain their actions so the cheaters don't know how to beat the system "
falls apart.

Transparency is a good thing and I'm hoping the CC at least gives a brief
explanation as to what rules were violated. Otherwise the decision would
seem arbitrary and capricious, especially since no continental US stations
were disqualified.

73
Ria, N2RJ


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:09 AM Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
wrote:

> I see the notation that this came from the April copy of CQ.  There goes my
> first three paragraphs! <g>
>
> A lot of familiar or semi-familiar calls on that list.
>
> I do have to wonder if any of the station(s) that Mike VE9AA & others have
> had a legitimate concern about, WRT alleged or potential 'scrubbed' calls,
> are on this list.  If that allegation is true (not that I disbelieve them,
> but so far we have only heard one side of the story), and the station(s)
> involved are on this list, well, it does make one wonder of that in turn
> led
> in whole or in part to the DQ.
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> DXer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:52 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Disqualified callsigns - CQ WW SSB contest.
>
> I saw this on another list. Nothing on the CQWW Blog. Now I see it here:
>
> http://dx-world.net/disqualified-callsigns-cq-ww-ssb-contest/
>
> I find the following line disturbing: 'Reports suggest....'
>
> Any reason it had to be made public this way? I don't fault the website, it
> was a scoop.
>
> We all want the CC to do its job, but why/how the info got out this way?
> Somehow I doubt all these people volunteered the info they were
> disqualified.
>
> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>