CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
From: Martin Durham <W1md@W1md.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:46:52 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hmmmmmm

What if you look at the spectrum as 1.8 - 30mhz. One station cq'ing on two 
frequencies is using twice the spectrum.  Regardless of the 'band' you are on. 
Riiiight??  :)

SO2R operators effectively get to use twice the spectrum that SO1R operators 
use...right?

Marty
W1MD

> On Mar 13, 2017, at 4:40 PM, Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Some bands are more limited in space than others.
> 40m - 75kHz
> 20m - 200kHz
> 15m -  250kHz
> 10m - 1.4MHz
> 
> Some bands are more productive than others, depending on propagation.
> 
> So with two CQs by one station on the same band the station engaging in
> this practice takes up twice the space and denies others the use of the
> productive or limited space band.
> 
> CQing on two bands is different because the other band may not be as
> productive, and even underused in low solar years.
> 
> Ria
> N2RJ
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:58 PM john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>> 
>> As far as spectrum usage goes what is the difference between this and a
>> single op CQing on two bands?
>> 
>> KK9A
>> 
>> 
>> To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
>> From:   W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
>> Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:05 -0600
>> 
>> 
>> Jeff,
>> 
>> Thanks for the comments. I agree with your interpretation of the rules, I
>> don't like that it is allowed and like many have asked the ARRL to close
>> this loophole.
>> 
>> Many believe that if everyone adopted this philosophy that the band would
>> be a mess. People would have a very difficult time finding a place to CQ
>> unless you were a big gun etc.
>> 
>> 73 and thanks for all the contacts from everywhere!
>> 
>> W0MU
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>