It would likely show all of those things. It should be easy to spot the
difference between assisted and unassisted operation with a full recording.
Since the requirement is for all audio that the operator can hear, the
process of tuning a second VFO or second radio looking for mults whilst
CQing on the first should be discernable.
Of course there can be some confusion sometimes. One or two slightly
doubtful quick fire mults would not arouse suspicion. But patterns become
easy to spot.
Peter G4MJS
On 8 Mar 2017 11:15 p.m., "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> Is it required to show all the receive audio, even when tuning, etc, or
> just the actual qso?
>
> will it show, for example, if a station claiming no assistance was in the
> middle of a good run, and qsy’d 20 kc or more to work one station, a new
> mult, and then came back on the run freq?
>
> would a show a station that shut down for the night one one freq, and then
> then next morning worked three new, rare mults all on different frequencies
> before starting a run of his own?
>
> would it show that he/she was on, lets say, 28.435 for one new mult, tuned
> down 10 kc in a minute for another, and then tuned up to 28.535 for yet
> another new one? would it show all that tuning time (even though its only a
> minute) and would it show tuning past other stations just to get to the
> mults?
>
> since I never heard any contest recordings this inquiring mind wants to
> know.....
>
> 73
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|