I think this is definitely a case for the ideal ‘Justice must not only be done,
it must be seen to be done.’
With all due respect to the committee, from the information available, we
cannot see justice being done here.
It is true we do not, now, know whether we are seeing everything or only the
things Ash wants us to see, but from what we CAN see, it looks as though the DQ
is based on flimsy grounds. Given the added consequence of the DQ (WRTC
eligibility), it demands the highest standard of proof of guilt.
I have my doubts a guilty party would protest to this degree. I suggest the
committee members owe it to themselves to be transparent on this one.
73, kelly, ve4xt
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 7:34 AM, Ashraf Chaabane <ash.kf5eyy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mike, Ria and all,
>
> I put online the CC accusations (their native emails) and my responses:
>
> http://www.kf5eyy.info/3V8SS_WWSSB16_DQ.htm
>
> I think that allows everyone to read from both sides. Now it's up to you to
> comment!
>
> 73
> --
> Ash ~ 3V8SS/KF5EYY
> http://www.kf5eyy.info/
> Phone/SMS: (+216) 22670026
> Skype: kf5eyy
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|