Hans,
What CQWW is doing is a great idea. It's called crowd sourcing. Better
to find out the discrepancies before the official results are published,
than to scramble after-the-fact, as happened several years ago.
This is just part of your continuing vendetta against open logs. Just
need to go back in the CQ-Contest archives to see this. Back then, you
also promised to not ever submit a log.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 01/06/2017 08:37 PM, kzerohb@gmail.com wrote:
Doug, this is possibly the most disturbing message that I have ever seen on
this reflector.
Essentially you, wearing your “Director of CQWW” hat, have gone out to the worldwide
fraternity of Amateur Radio sportsmen and said…..
“Hey, guys, here are the logs of everybody who played in this Amateur Radio contest. Would
you please be a good citizen and have a look to see if you can find some cheaters among your fellow
hams in there. We look forward to your result, Comrades. Here’s a special mailbox.”
I really wanted to help MWA in the club competition, so I sent in a small log. Probably too
small to worry you about, but have a look anyhow. Because it’s the last one
I’ll submit.
73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a boy and his radio"™
From: kr2q@optimum.net
Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 2:09 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2016 SSB logs now public
Please see http://cqww.com/publiclogs/2016ph/
For the last two years, the contest community has used the public logs to assist the CQWW
Contest Committee in finding possible “issues” with some of the logs. We look
forward to your feedback again this year.
You may send your findings and concerns to: questions@cqww.com
Please base your findings and concerns on an actual log review and not simply
on your suspicions.
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|