Ward,
Very interesting. But this approach begs the question: If prescription
finally got wrong (name of the medicine or dosage) who's fault is it?
Transmitter or receiver? Should not both sides be penalized?
73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Исходное сообщение -----
От: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Кому: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Отправлено: 10 ноября 2016 г. 21:18
Тема: Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again)
> If it wasn't a penmanship contest then, why is it a typing contest now?
At the risk of setting off a "plastic owl pointing true north by remote
control" thread...
Why is it that we have contests at all? It is to practice our ability to
communicate and to reward effectiveness - in whatever form that takes.
Part of it is knowing when the bands are open and closed. Part of it is
assembling a station that works well. Part of it is having good operating
technique. And part of it is accurately transcribing the exchanged
information into whatever format is required.
We are fond of claiming that contesting makes us good public service
operators and all that back-patting we do for ourselves. Imagine we are
relaying orders for prescription medicines needed in a disaster area. Is
a typo in "hydrochlorothiazide" acceptable because we were in a hurry?
("Can you give me that phonetically before the band closes?") Is
mistakenly changing a dosage of 50 mg to 500 mg OK because we hit 0 twice?
("Whoa - how did that huge hairy bat get in here?") Of course not...we
would recognize that as an error and we should do so when N0AX gets
changed to N0XA. Each unforced error needs to produce negative feedback
so we will work to lower our error rate. The CQ WW introduction of
penalties for errors was exactly the right remedy for sloppy operating
because it provides both carrot and stick to operate at a rate no faster
than what optimizes effective operating. Nothing is error-free but a
three-QSO penalty has a way of focusing the mind.
At any rate (so to speak), anything noted during the period of competition
is fair game for log correction. I would prefer in the long term that
QSOs are submitted in real-time and verified shortly thereafter so that
this whole notion of "log" goes away along with all the misbehavior and
delays it engenders, but in the mean time, transcription into the
submitted record of competition is as much a part of the contest as
transmitting the information in the first place.
73, Ward N0AX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|