CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification

To: "cq-contest-request@contesting.com" <cq-contest-request@contesting.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification
From: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:37:36 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Some love them some hate them!

But what the hell does it matter ?
As long as the remote operator is staying within the rules and correctly 
identifying the transmitter location.

Coming from experience as I have operated contests from remotes. There is only 
a handful of people who don’t like it!
Remote operators maybe have access to a good station, but so what ? they have 
to deal with a lot more different things that makes it more difficult.. LATENCY 
being a big issue at times!

Jealousy springs to mind......

Anyway that’s my input to Mr O’Kanes postings on this subject

73 MM0LID
Scott Mcleman

From: cq-contest-request@contesting.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>