CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification

To: "'Steve Maki'" <lists@oakcom.org>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification
From: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Reply-to: ed@w0yk.com
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 21:17:26 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Or, a mic with a Bluetooth connection to the radio.

Ed W0YK
_____________________________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Steve Maki
Sent: 01 October, 2016 18:52
To: cq-contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contesting Classification

On 9/10/2016 9:47 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:

> They are not radio amateurs, they are hybrid-communications
> amateurs.
>
> Mike asks - Is there supposed to be some sort of "shame"
> attached to operating remotely?
>
> The answer is "Yes, because you're on the internet".

Just for the sake of argument, let's say I'm sitting in front of my 
radio, but lost my proper mic cable. But just by luck I have an internet 
link to the radio, so I go ahead and run the contest that way.

Should I be ashamed?

-Steve K8LX

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>