To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW madness |
From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:50:10 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Why are we beating up the CQWW contest? SS and NAQP are not fair either. Just advantage those outside W1 and W2 so somehow that makes it okay that they are unfair. Same propagation problems and the scoring doesn't offset it. And those contest are hardly growing compared to CQWW. Why not fix those first, and see how it goes, rather than starting with CQWW which doesn't look to need fixing according to ant statistics that I see. I repeat - create a new contest to solve this issue. Just make sure you skew the rules enough so that a guy in California with a 50 ft tower and a tribander can win. Otherwise its not fair right? Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Kelly Taylor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW madness, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness, Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW madness, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |