CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Bravo - CQ

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Bravo - CQ
From: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:21:18 +0900 (JST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In article <001e01d0af52$0a47a170$1ed6e450$@earthlink.net>,
        "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote,
        on "Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:20:08 -0400";

> Also, in
> looking at my logs and others, it looks pretty random whether the receive or
> the transmit frequency ends up in the log when using single radio split.  It
> probably depends on the software and which VFO is the transmit vs the
> receive.  The intent needs to be clarified here and the less intrusive the
> better to allow for software, radio, and technique flexibility.

It doesn't mention in the Cabrillo 
specification(http://wwrof.org/cabrillo/cabrillo-qso-templates/).

"freq is frequency or band:"

I'm not sure this is intentional or not.
-- 
Katsuhiro 'Don' Kondou, JH5GHM
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>