I forgot about the "infrastructural" aspect.
The infrastructural thing is the nature of our hobby. Results cannot be
fully adjudicated according to the rules of each contest.
There are WRTCers who have made it out of the rules in the past.
We all know about it, we even talk about it during WRTCs.
Even if it's pure speculation, there is something wrong about the
competition.
We'd better focus on that type of things, don't you think.
Otherwise it will become meaningless hobby.
73,
Martin LU5DX
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
wrote:
> Agreed Ranko,
>
> A scoring system that favours Single ops to compete in a Multi Op contest
> (WRTC) and disadvantages those who operate Multi Ops obviously has major
> flaws -
>
> Considering the format was M2 from the last WRTC it is even further
> flawed.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Trent VK4TS
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> 4O3A
> Sent: Friday, 29 May 2015 2:13 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications
>
> Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two
> important
> parts of rules:
>
> 1. Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat
> reasons why it should be longer.
> 2. Weight for categories - to correct MS weight from 0.9 to 1.0, as
> it was earlier. As majority of active contest stations will try to qualify
> for WRTC, this will "disqualify" MS for next two years. If it won't be
> changed, or WRTC qualification or MS participation in next two years must
> be sacrificed.
>
> I know it is hard/impossible to make everything to be ideal, and will not
> impress my personal opinion about other details I disagree, but those two
> are "infrastructural" :-)
>
> 73
> Ranko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|