Hi Randy,
I agree with this dichotomy and I think ruling should reflect this state of
thing.
However let's take my very personal case : I feel I am in the second
"participant" class.
Still, I almost always can win some "Country certificate" (XV9NPS plays in
Single-Band, XV1X/XV2RZ/3W3B when they're here play in High-Power).
Always trying to win a Certificate does it place me in the "Competitors" ?
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/
> Le 25 mai 2015 à 03:04, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 20:04:33 -0000
> From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
> To: "'W0MU'" <w0mu@w0mu.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed contest rules
> Message-ID: <011b01d0965c$da74f500$8f5edf00$@charter.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> The discussions on this reflector have clearly demonstrated the challenge
> for contest administrators and rule development.
>
> There are really 2 (maybe 3) classes of participants in a contest. There
> are the guys who spend the time and money to travel/build/operate with the
> intent of being competitive at the world, continent or national level.
> Let's call them the "competitor" class. Then there are the rest of the
> participants who just want to work stations and have fun. They like seeing
> their score in the results and enjoy beating their locals or friends. Let's
> call them the "participant" class. (The third group might be people who get
> on but don't submit logs.)
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|