There are all sorts of grievances that one can lodge on scoring. Let's
see, station in W4 works station in W6 (2400 miles). Points awarded - 0
Station in PA works station in DL (228 miles). Points awarded - 1
Station in VE3 works station in W3 (347 miles). Points awarded - 2
On and on and on.
73 Rich NN3W
On 5/27/2015 8:56 AM, Mike Tessmer wrote:
Let's see some real data to back up these proposals. CQWW logs are available.
Crunch the numbers and publish the results.
73, Mike K9NW
K9YC wrote:
I made several specific suggestions that had NOTHING to do with distance-based
scoring. Why no response? One involved >redefining what constitutes a multiplier
in ways that significantly reduce the disparity between regions. No one in the
>contesting establishment wants to talk about it because THEY lose part of their
advantage.
I proposed a regional handicap system where each score is adjusted based on how well
the contesters in his region did compared >to all regions. No one in the
contesting establishment wants to talk about this either, because they lose another
part of >their contesting advantage.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|