CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology

To: <w1ve@yccc.org>, "'CQ-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology
From: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:54:15 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree Gerry but the same answer could be said for all the EU folks that just 
got warnings.

 

Ed

 

From: Gerry Hull [mailto:gerry@yccc.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Edward Sawyer; CQ-Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology

 

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse, but I bet 100% of those calling you, Ed, 
are clicking on a spot and not realizing it is split.

 

Gerry

 

 

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

To be clear – I have had US hams call me on 7030 when listening there.  
Obviously, I am not trying listen to US hams but they come anyway.  Probably 4 
or 5 a contest if I do that for an hour or two.



Ed



From: Chris Plumblee [mailto:chris.plumblee@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 7:49 AM
To: VK4TS Trent Sampson
Cc: sawyered@earthlink.net; cq-contest@contesting.com

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology



The U.S. Phone band extends down to 7.125, which means 7.127.5 or 7.128 LSB 
(depending on how confident you are in the cleanliness of your transmitted 
signal) is perfectly legal.



The FCC made that change in 2007 or 2008, if I recall.



73, Chris WF3C

On Thursday, May 7, 2015, VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com> wrote:

" Also, I have heard numerous US hams call on 40M below 7150,"

I just figured they could because I often park simplex on 7130~7140 and work
plenty of US stations



-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com <javascript:;> ] On 
Behalf Of Ed
Sawyer
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2015 8:02 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology

I think its great that this is finally getting the action that it has
deserved.  Kudos to Randy for leading the way on it.



2 comments/questions from me:



1)      I am very curious how Power was decided to be abused in the cases
where that was a violation.  Randy and I have had some dialog on my case of
seeing the difference in score and on air observation of my station changing
from the low power to the high power use and category.  There were a couple
of cases where it would have been likely obvious that I couldn't be using
low power any more (and wasn't) that Randy and I talked about.

2)      I have heard numerous people working outside of USA bands yet don't
see any USA calls on the warning list.  Is there a way that they should be
reported in the future for possible investigation?  If so, I was unaware of
this interest of the committee.  As all USA ops know, there seems to be some
difference in legal interpretation between country regulatory authorities on
exactly when you are "out of band".  Here in the US, the sideband is
considered part of the transmitted signal and therefore you can't legally
transmit on 21449.  Whether you can transmit on 212447.5 is a matter of
debate depending on the cleanness of your signal vs the -40dB skirts of your
signal spectrum but clearly, for any SSB signal 21448 and above is not going
to be legal for even the cleanest SSB signal from what I can determine
(maybe some even debate this - not sure).  Also, I have heard numerous US
hams call on 40M below 7150, some have even called me while I am listening
split.  Should we be emailing these infractions somewhere when observed?

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



--
Chris Plumblee
407.494.5155

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>