To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology |
From: | <john@kk9a.com> |
Date: | Wed, 6 May 2015 20:14:35 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In all of the contests that I have operated 200 watts is the same category as 1000 watts. John KK9A To: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 15:46:33 -0400 I think some have misunderstood my post. I wasn't talking about the legal power limit. For example if I say I'm running 200 watts that puts me in the low power category. Now if I claim 200 watts ( that puts me in the LP category) and I'm really running a KW that's cheating . That being said I'm sure there are some stations running more than the legal limit in their country. Jeff _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Band Bandpass Filters, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology, WW3S |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology, Jeff Clarke |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology, WW3S |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |