CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB
From: Mirko S57AD <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 15:06:10 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Amen! I completely agree with Paul!

73,  Mirko, S57AD

2014-10-19 13:04 GMT+02:00 Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>:

> On 19/10/2014 04:27, Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
>
>  you should stop displaying your ignorance and disrespect of international
>> and countries regulations and memory of hams who lost their lives and
>> licenses.
>>
>
> It's clear that politics and contesting don't mix.
>
> If the UN cannot settle territorial disputes, we
> can hardly expect the IARU or individual contest
> sponsors to do better.
>
> There is nothing new, or unique, about such disputes.
> It seems to me that, for contesting purposes, some
> expedience (and neutrality) is called for.
>
> Whether contesters in Crimea use Russian or Ukranian
> calls makes no difference to the rest of us - unless,
> of course, we're trying to score political points.
>
> I suggest that, in either case, we assume they are
> licensed by their administration of choice and
> just work and score them accordingly.  Isn't that
> what we've always done?
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>