CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB
From: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:08:48 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Andy,

Politics and ham radio should be kept separate and operation should be
encouraged everywhere.  Indeed, I would say that only positive developments
can come from continued communication, amateur radio or otherwise. There
are better ways to deal with the current situation than to discourage (if
not prevent) participation and even deleting QSOs that are permitted and
perfectly legal from both sides.

I hope to work you next weekend, whether it counts or not!

73, Dave K3ZJ

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Andy Kazantsev <uu0jm@mail.ru> wrote:

> Hi, gyus!
>
> What do you feel about it....
>
>
> http://cqnewsroom.blogspot.com/2014/10/cq-policy-on-crimean-stations-using.html
>
> I participated in CQ WW RTTY 2014,
> and planning to participate in CQ WW SSB&CW....
> Spent a lot of effort and resources
> who it will compensate?
> Sorry if it's true ....
>
>
> 73! Andy UB7K
> ex. UU0JM, UU7J,
>
>
>
>
> --
> С уважением,
>  Andy                          mailto:uu0jm@mail.ru
>
>
> ---
> Это сообщение свободно от вирусов и вредоносного ПО благодаря защите от
> вирусов avast!
> http://www.avast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>